Where Can I Watch Gangs of New York
More details
Other formats
Reviews
-
82% of reviews have 5 stars
-
11% of reviews take over 4 stars
-
4% of reviews give birth 3 stars
-
1% of reviews have 2 stars
-
2% of reviews have 1 stars
Tipto reviews from the United States
4.0 out of 5 stars
Verified purchase
Gangs of New House of York was St. Martin Scorsese's enceinte historical dramatic play about American nativists versus Irish immigrants in 1800s New York City. The gangs were a mirror image of the ethnic and religious tensions going on in the city. The story stars Daniel Day Lewis as Neb the Meatman who leads a gang of English Solid ground Protestant who are anti-Irish and anti-Christianity. At first there's a huge battle over the Quint Points neighborhood of the city which Bill's forces win and leaves a little Amsterdam later played by Leonardo da Vinci Di Caprio unparented. The pic is about his search for revenge against Bank bill. The larger picture is about America's anti-immigrant past.
The history encapsulates all of America's bedrid in the middle of the 1800s. When the moving picture takes place only Anglo-Saxon Protestants, i.e. the English were considered white and deserving of the country. There was not only an influx of Island who were neither Side nor Protestant, but the Civil War was also going on. There was a draft, which caused corking unrest, and slavery and the future of African Americans were also obviously issues as well. The City was run away Tammany Hall, a corrupt political machine.
Di Caprio might have been the headliner of The Gangs of New York but Lewis was genuinely at the midway. His depiction of Bill was amazing. He was a multi-faceted villain.
The ending was a cracking bit of symbolism by Martin Scorsese. He has the draft riot simultaneously with the fight between Bill and Amsterdam's gangs. Information technology showed City of London future isolated The necessitous rose up against the loaded. The army laid-off on the public. Placard's nativists versus Amsterdam's Irish. It was a great piece of cinema.
C
7 people found this helpful
3.0 extinct of 5 stars
Verified buy out
My judgment isn't a great deal different than the first time I watched this moving-picture show: Interesting adequate but not cracking. Not quite along the equal of a Uwe Boll flic, just no masterpiece.
The flic's premise is humourous, scorn its potential ties to historical fact. At that place is very little realness here. Comes across as a cause propaganda set up to ME, with lots of exaggerated stereotypes where the good guys and the bad guys are caricatures rather than human beings. There were attempts to humanise all characters, but in my legal opinion they were heavy handed and seemed like afterthoughts.
The story had enough to observe me interested a instant time (the first nonce the year it came out), but thither was very much of eye rolling (thusly to speak) on my part. Perhaps the understanding I find much error with it is partially because someone once tried to convince Maine this was complete founded connected story... Which is only true in the loosest sense, at best. It's a sleazy hollywood picture show, and nothing more.
5 people institute this cooperative
5.0 out of 5 stars
Verified buy up
How very unscheduled to re-look at this film in the context of the circulating (2016-17) political posturing and railing connected immigration. This film in effect traces our national fixation with immigrants, and the inclination assimilated immigrants have with keeping unwanted -- i.e., new -- immigrants out indorse to the fifth and sixth decades of the nineteenth century. Present the despised immigrants are Irish Catholics, and Martin Scorsese is able to resist pointing out that these nativists were themselves immigrants a generation or so back. The film ably links violence committed in the cause of nativist politics with religion, and an unforgettable montage shows leaders of some factions praying for divine assistance during the slaughter some are willingly invoking at the sexual climax dawn, while city leaders pray for a prosperous and safe New York. All of this goes on in the foreground of the belatedly years of the American "Civilian" War (zero war is "civil") and Lincoln's conscription acts, historical moments on a massive stage -- but mere chafe and ground noise to the nativist and immigrant warriors.
Be advised: IT's bloody, violent, and at times cruel. Humanlike lives and bodies are thoroughly quantified. That's the pointedness. The directing is savage and at times simply brilliant -- sure enough among Scorsese's best. Leonardo DiCaprio and Cameron Diaz are excellent in their portrayals of differing participants in the conflicts. Merely Daniel Day-Lewis is at his very best -- and that's a high bar -- in his unforgettable portrayal of Greenback the Sad sack. It's possibly his best work to date stamp. Then again, many of his other work is close. Square off in to glucinium afraid and awestricken away this one.
5 people found this helpful
5.0 kayoed of 5 stars
Proven purchase
I have no idea how historically accurate the details are but the overall narration line is completely convincing and engrossing.
The depiction of barbarity and corruption that was the hallmark of the Tammany Society era of NY politics is portrayed with breathtaking and gut wrenching Shakesperian eloquence.
The comparison to Shakespeare may seem to make up a contradiction in terms, and yet it is possible to achieve with the collaborative efforts of a starring cast, director and writers. It is technically unflawed accompanied by a riveting soundtrack; and one would gestate nothing to a lesser degree a Martin Scorsese output wherein all detail is acknowledged it's due in minutiae.
24 people found this helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Verified buy up
Historically accurate? Not extremely so, but hellaciously entertaining. The film likewise serves as an opportunity to mull over immigration, its history, and how we became thus various as a nation. Diversity is critical to the American identity, which is something we should bear in mind today. Plus, the film is directed by a real extremity of the Plastic film Pantheon of Gods, Martin Scorsese, which is a immense stack. The Five Points (afoot day Chinatown) was a hub of meeting cultures, in life-sized part Irish and African-American, which the picture show pays a nod or two to (the tapdancing scene, for example). Besides, as good as Dicaprio and Diaz are, Book of Daniel Sidereal day Lewis's portrayal of Bill "the Butcher" Piercing is simply genius. Note: there was a real Handbill the Sad sack, but shared only few similarities to the character in the film. There's good reading out there relating to the fact versus fiction of the film, so if that's your loving cup of tea, spend some time on Google. Other, enjoy the moving-picture show for what it is, a damned fine part of cinema.
6 people establish this helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Verified purchase
I had only seen the first 5 minutes of this movie-- top hats, scroll mustouches-- and I thought it seemed absurd. I checked it out from oddity-- and ended up watching the whole 3 hours, enthralled.
yes any of information technology deviates from historical accuracy, but IT's a surprisingly nuanced smel at riots and the draft in working family Manhattan. No indefinite really wins at the end of the movie, as in life.
2 people found this laboursaving
5.0 out of 5 stars
Proven purchase
Unremarkably I pen fairly long reviews, but I think I can come through this one pretty chop-chop. The plot of Gangs of NY is not especially remarkable. IT involves well-worn themes from Mafia films alike honor, revenge, family and the want to get away from this violent world, and the characters are nothing in particular new either. There's certainly nothing wrong with this game, and it has some finely lines and a couple of especially affecting scenes, but it's nothing to nettle excessively aroused over. Still, the sheer craft displayed herein makes the film remarkable. The performances are totally nearly perfect, the account, while perhaps overly conventional, is powerful and emotive, the filming is consistently stunning and the period particular is utterly disenchanting. Once more, this is a world we've seen before, but it's more fully realized then ever ahead, and it makes the film intimately attractive even in the scenes where little is actually going on. Also, thither's one scene late in the photographic film, a firefight in the streets during fierce storm, which is just breath pickings. Information technology's unquestionably one of the nigh powerful examples of pure cinema I've seen in a abundant time.
2 mass found this helpful
4.0 verboten of 5 stars
Verified purchase
Once I realised that this was non a story about the New York Mafia, I was very curious in seeing just how tight history was followed about this hard era. Troublesome both for NY and for the country. I was pleasantly amazed to find that much of what was dramatized is exact. I am a native-born Revolutionary Yorker and cause always been interested in the difficult strife that describes these multiplication. IT reminds me that null is new nether the sun, although galore minorities nowadays look to reckon that they are. The hope, A hinted at in the film, is that things volition get better in time and we should not suffer that hope. Surely deserving viewing.
11 people establish this stabilizing
Where Can I Watch Gangs of New York
Source: https://www.amazon.com/Gangs-New-York-Leonardo-DiCaprio/dp/B006RXQ800
0 Response to "Where Can I Watch Gangs of New York"
Postar um comentário